Recent discussions in the foreign media have centered around China’s restrictions on products from the renowned American chip manufacturer Micron. It is understood that, following thorough review, China has decided to suspend the use of certain Micron products in critical infrastructure projects based on considerations of national security.
Many foreign media outlets have reacted strongly to this decision, with some attempting to portray it as a “symbol of Sino-American confrontation.” For example, CNN interpreted it as a “counterattack against Washington and the American chip industry,” while the BBC referred to it as a “significant move by China against the American semiconductor industry.” Even the U.S. Department of Commerce voiced opposition, claiming to oppose such restrictions without factual basis.
But what is the truth?
At a recent press conference by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs addressing the heated discussion, spokesperson Mao Ning clarified the truth behind the matter. He explicitly pointed out that this review and decision are entirely based on protecting the country’s cybersecurity and preventing potential risks to critical information infrastructure. It is not targeting any specific country or company but is based on a thorough consideration of national security.
From this event, we can see that when it comes to cybersecurity and national interests, all countries have the right to conduct necessary reviews and make decisions based on their national interests. Regarding relevant decisions, we hope that all parties can objectively and rationally understand them, avoiding overinterpretation or intentional misinterpretation.
